Thursday 7 November 2013

The Starving Games Spoiler Free Review


1 on 5

Just once it appeared as if Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer (2010's "Vampires Suck") had abused the Hollywood movie industry enough and been banished permanently from writing and directional their own movies, they show make a copy sort of a quite medium plague, infecting viewers with gangrene of the eyes, ears and brain. you would like to numb your mind with zero recreation price to offset the throwaway trashiness? These deaf doofuses have gotten this specific lowly accomplishment on lock. What they can not do is devise one amusing joke or pay it off with something approaching correct cohesive temporal arrangement. That their genre of selection is spoof comedy is embarrassing for them, and tragic for anyone with the misfortune of getting to take a seat through their torturing celebrations in stupid pointlessness. A parody of 2012's "The Hunger Games" while not a solitary laugh to be mustered, "The Starving Games" is eighty three minutes of resentful stereotyping, lame lavatory gags and aimless, typically bafflingly noncurrent film references. Yes, at one purpose somebody whoops and hollers, "I'm the king of the world!" affirmative, that line was already compete out fifteen years agone.

In a dystopic vision of the longer term wherever the country is split into districts and 2 kids from every one square measure annually chosen by lottery to vie during a televised fight to the death known as "The Starving Games," juvenile person Kantmiss Evershot (Maiara Walsh) courageously chooses to require the place of her sis, flower (Kennedy Hermansen), once the girl's name is termed. connexion her from District twelve is baker's son Peter Malarkey (Cody Allen Christian), United Nations agency uses the competition as a foolish ploy to induce nearer to Kantmiss. With cameras pointed in their direction and everybody, together with Kantmiss' relief back home, valley (Brant Daugherty), watching, the fatal games start. The prize for the last word sole survivor? A partly consumed pickle and a present card to Subway.

What is there to mention regarding Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer that hasn't already been written in my tirade-filled reviews of "Epic motion picture," "Disaster Movie" and "Meet the Spartans?" Their filmmaking style—if one will decision it that—is lumbering, foolish and egalitarian as they parade out a caricaturized stream of fashionable motion picture characters (from "Avatar," "The Avengers," "Oz the good and Powerful," etc.) and celebrities (e.g., Taylor Swift, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, "Gangnam Style" musician Psy) performed by lookalike actors and so purpose their fingers at them whereas monotonously prod, "Isn't this funny? is not this funny?" there's no sarcasm concerned. there's neither a tweaking of expectations nor a degree in their showing. Friedberg and Seltzer don't have any angle, aside from to emulate the maturity level of a drooling, snot-nosed, 14-year-old assimilator whose heroes square measure Beavis and Butthead. once this fails them, they become 16-year-old sociopaths United Nations agency suppose execution-style killings and body decomposition square measure the peak of gaiety.

There is a twinkle of talent glimpsed currently and once more by Maiara Walsh (TV's "Switched at Birth") within the Jennifer Lawrence role as Kantmiss Evershot, however gamely creating the most effective out of a catastrophe does not precisely get her way. Forced into licking pus from Peter Malarkey's back wounds, taking a fall with a beehive on her head, and running around a stage once the dress she is carrying erupts into flames, Walsh's potential isn't any match for a suffocatingly insulting script that Uwe Boll and erectile dysfunction Wood would have wasted no time in scrapping. As Peter, William Frederick Cody Allen Christian (2009's "Surrogates") is asked to scream like associate exaggerated Seventies depiction of effeminate homosexualism when he gets frightened or is vulnerable. the remainder of the performers needn't be mentioned by name; in spite of however onerous they may be making an attempt, this film ensures they're created to seem like imbeciles.

"The Starving Games" is depressing to observe and every one the a lot of alarming to imagine the under-the-table method of creating it. sure enough nobody concerned sufficiently old to place words along would expect the finished product to be something aside from awful. If the Zuckers and Abrahams and Brookses of the "Airplane!"/"The Naked Gun!"/"Young Frankenstein" era shot slapstick to industrial and demanding acclaim, it's talent-deficient hacks like Friedberg and Seltzer United Nations agency still do their half in giving these once-raucous comedies a nasty name. "Dumb" humor doesn't even have to be dumb—it will, in fact, be clever, good and even insightful—and this can be wherever they frequently miss the mark by a opened exposure. "It's even higher in 3D!" a locality twelve viewer exclaims as he and also the remainder of the town throw on their large glasses to observe Kantmiss and Peter get freaky during a cave. A pro-3D message is suspect by itself—particularly during a show that's in 2D—but "The Starving Games" is one case wherever having to observe a motion picture through virtual specs, ideally with a weak-bulbed projector, can be an honest issue. The dimmer, the better. what's "The Starving Games," anyway, if not a blackened abysm into nothingness?

No comments:

Post a Comment